Overview of Florida Lemon Law
Florida’s Lemon Law provides crucial protection for consumers who purchase a new or used vehicle that suffers from substantial defects. This law Artikels the conditions under which a vehicle can be deemed a “lemon” and the remedies available to the buyer. It’s designed to ensure that consumers aren’t stuck with vehicles that are consistently problematic and cannot be reasonably repaired.
Requirements for a Used Car to Qualify
Used vehicles, unlike new ones, face a more stringent test to qualify under the Florida Lemon Law. A used car must have been purchased within a specific timeframe. This often involves considering the vehicle’s age and mileage in relation to the purchase date. Further, the defect must significantly affect the safe operation of the vehicle. This means the problem isn’t just an inconvenience, but a genuine threat to the driver and passengers.
Consumer Rights and Responsibilities
Consumers have specific rights under Florida’s Lemon Law, including the right to a refund or replacement vehicle. However, these rights are contingent upon the consumer meeting certain responsibilities. The consumer must have made reasonable attempts to have the vehicle repaired, documented these attempts, and provided the dealer with opportunities to address the issues. This documentation is vital in proving the validity of the claim.
Comparison of Lemon Laws for New and Used Vehicles
The Lemon Law for new vehicles and used vehicles have differences. While both aim to protect consumers, the criteria for a vehicle being a “lemon” and the specific timelines for initiating a claim can vary. For example, the timeframe for repairs and the number of attempts to repair the defect may differ based on whether the vehicle is new or used. The specific conditions for used vehicles, such as purchase timeframe, can also impact the eligibility criteria.
Process for Filing a Claim
The process for filing a claim under Florida’s Lemon Law is a structured one, requiring careful documentation and adherence to deadlines. A step-by-step guide is crucial for a successful claim.
- Initial Repair Attempts: The buyer must make reasonable attempts to have the vehicle repaired by the dealer. This involves providing the dealer with ample opportunity to address the defect.
- Documentation: All repair attempts, including dates, repair orders, and communication with the dealer, should be meticulously documented. This detailed record is essential for proving the existence and persistence of the defect.
- Notification of Intent: After a reasonable number of repair attempts, the buyer should formally notify the dealer of their intent to pursue a claim under the Lemon Law. This formal notification should clearly Artikel the defect and the unsuccessful repair attempts.
- Negotiation and Mediation: Before resorting to legal action, the buyer should attempt to negotiate a resolution with the dealer. Mediation can be a viable option to resolve the issue outside of court.
- Legal Action (if necessary): If negotiations fail, the buyer can initiate legal action to pursue their rights under the Lemon Law.
Common Issues with Used Cars
Used cars, while often more affordable than new models, can present unique challenges. Understanding potential problems is crucial for consumers to make informed decisions and protect themselves from costly repairs. A thorough inspection and knowledge of common issues can help avoid costly surprises and ensure a reliable and safe vehicle.
Many used car problems stem from wear and tear, neglect, or previous accidents that may not have been fully repaired. Recognizing these issues can empower buyers to negotiate better prices or walk away from a potentially problematic vehicle. Ultimately, proactive steps can save consumers significant time, money, and frustration in the long run.
Mechanical Problems Leading to Lemon Law Claims
Pre-existing mechanical problems that persist after multiple attempts at repair can be grounds for a lemon law claim. These issues frequently manifest as recurring engine problems, transmission malfunctions, electrical system failures, or suspension issues. A common example is a vehicle with a faulty engine that consistently overheats, requiring repeated repairs that fail to resolve the underlying issue.
Typical Defects Affecting Reliability and Safety
Numerous defects can significantly impact a used car’s reliability and safety. These can include faulty brakes, steering systems with compromised alignment, or compromised air bags. Electrical problems, such as malfunctioning lights or power windows, might not seem critical initially, but they can contribute to a cascade of issues. For example, a recurring electrical malfunction could lead to a dangerous situation, such as the failure of the anti-lock braking system (ABS).
Common Consumer Complaints Regarding Used Cars in Florida
Consumers in Florida, like those nationwide, often report issues with used vehicles. These range from poor communication from dealerships to issues with the vehicle’s performance and reliability. Common complaints include persistent engine problems, transmission failures, electrical system malfunctions, and issues with the car’s safety features, such as faulty brakes or air bags. The failure of dealerships to address these concerns effectively can escalate issues, making a lemon law claim more likely.
Typical Time Frames for Repairs Under Florida’s Lemon Law
The timeframe for repairs under Florida’s lemon law is crucial for consumers. The specifics of the timeframe vary depending on the nature of the defect and the number of repair attempts.
| Defect Type | Typical Repair Attempts | Estimated Timeframe (months) |
|---|---|---|
| Minor Electrical Malfunctions | 1-2 | 1-3 |
| Major Transmission Issues | 3-4 | 3-6 |
| Engine Problems (Recurring) | 3+ | 6+ |
| Safety-Related Defects (Brakes, Airbags) | 1-2 (potentially expedited) | 1-3 (potentially expedited) |
Note: These are estimates and actual timeframes can vary significantly. It’s important to consult with an attorney for accurate information regarding your specific situation.
Proving a Used Car is a Lemon
Establishing that a used car is a “lemon” under Florida law requires a meticulous documentation of defects and repair attempts. This process necessitates a detailed record of communications with the dealer and the repair shop, along with copies of all repair orders and invoices. A crucial element is demonstrating a pattern of recurring problems despite reasonable repair attempts.
Demonstrating a used car is a lemon hinges on providing substantial evidence to support claims of significant defects that persist despite multiple repair attempts. This often involves a detailed timeline of events, including dates of purchase, reported defects, repair attempts, and the results of each attempt. This comprehensive documentation is essential to prove that the car’s issues are not isolated incidents but rather consistent problems indicating a fundamental defect or manufacturing flaw.
Evidence Needed to Prove a Used Car is a Lemon
Florida’s lemon law requires substantial evidence to substantiate a claim. This evidence includes a clear record of the vehicle’s history, including purchase date, any pre-existing defects, and a documented record of all attempts to repair the vehicle. Documentation is paramount, including repair orders, invoices, correspondence with the dealer, and any witness statements.
Examples of Documentation Required to Support a Claim
Essential documentation for a lemon law claim includes:
- Copies of the sales contract and any warranties.
- Detailed records of all repair attempts, including dates, descriptions of the defects, and the results of each repair.
- Copies of repair orders, invoices, and receipts from all repair attempts.
- Copies of all correspondence with the dealer, including emails, letters, and phone records.
- If applicable, witness statements detailing the recurring issues and the dealer’s responses.
Demonstrating a Reasonable Number of Repair Attempts
Establishing a reasonable number of repair attempts is a key aspect of a lemon law claim. This involves demonstrating that the same defect has been repaired multiple times without lasting resolution. This is not just about the number of attempts, but the nature and frequency of the issues. A pattern of the same defect recurring after repairs indicates a more serious problem than isolated incidents. A single issue that is repaired once is not sufficient to prove a lemon.
Factors to Consider When Determining if a Repair is Adequate
A repair is not considered adequate if the same defect persists. Factors to consider include:
- The nature of the defect and its impact on the vehicle’s functionality.
- The length of time the defect has persisted despite repair attempts.
- Whether the defect was repaired effectively and whether the problem has returned.
- Whether the repair attempt resolved the issue, or whether the defect reoccurred.
Legal Requirements for Repair Attempts and Timeframe Limits
The following table Artikels the legal requirements for repair attempts and timeframe limits in Florida lemon law claims. Meeting these criteria is crucial for a successful claim.
| Repair Attempts | Timeframe Limit |
|---|---|
| A reasonable number of repair attempts for the same defect (generally, 3 or more), depending on the severity of the problem. | Within a reasonable period of time, typically determined by the nature and complexity of the defect. |
Dealer Responsibilities
Florida’s lemon law places significant responsibilities on used car dealers when a buyer alleges a vehicle is a lemon. Dealers must understand and comply with these regulations to avoid legal repercussions and maintain a positive reputation. These responsibilities extend beyond simply selling the car and include a structured process for handling claims.
Dealer Obligations Upon a Lemon Law Claim
Dealers have a crucial role in responding to lemon law claims, which often involves a series of steps to assess the validity of the complaint and resolve the issue. Their obligations encompass proactive investigation and a commitment to fair resolution.
Steps to Address a Lemon Law Claim
A systematic approach is essential for dealers when handling lemon law claims. The following steps Artikel a structured response:
- Initial Assessment and Documentation: The dealer must carefully document all aspects of the claim, including purchase date, repair history, and specific complaints. This comprehensive record is critical for proving the dealer’s efforts in addressing the issue. A thorough record includes dates, times, names of individuals involved, and descriptions of defects. This detailed documentation can protect the dealer in case of a legal challenge.
- Repair Attempts and Communication: The dealer is obligated to make reasonable repair attempts. This includes promptly addressing the reported defects, utilizing qualified mechanics, and providing the buyer with updates on the progress. Open communication is key; dealers should keep the buyer informed throughout the repair process. This can be done via email, phone calls, or in-person meetings. Examples include sending repair updates or confirming appointment times. Maintaining clear records of all communication is paramount.
- Reviewing the Manufacturer’s Guidelines: Dealers should review the manufacturer’s guidelines for addressing warranty claims, particularly for used vehicles. This ensures compliance with industry standards and prevents potential legal issues. The manufacturer may have specific procedures or criteria for resolving issues. Dealers must understand and adhere to these guidelines to maximize the likelihood of a successful resolution.
- Evaluating the Validity of the Claim: The dealer must evaluate whether the claim is legitimate. This involves examining the vehicle’s history, repair records, and the buyer’s complaints. A careful evaluation helps the dealer determine the best course of action. Consider whether the defect is consistent with a pattern of problems or if it’s an isolated incident.
- Settlement Options: If the claim is deemed valid, the dealer must explore settlement options. This might include offering a repair, replacement, or refund. Settlement options should be tailored to the specific situation, ensuring fairness to both parties. Dealers should be aware of legal precedents in similar cases.
Handling Repair Attempts and Documentation
Thorough documentation is crucial for managing repair attempts. A log should meticulously record each repair attempt, including the date, mechanic’s name, parts replaced, and a description of the repairs performed. This detailed documentation is vital for demonstrating the dealer’s efforts in addressing the defect. For example, if a transmission problem is reported, the repair log should show attempts to diagnose and fix the issue, including any parts replaced and the mechanic’s findings.
Common Pitfalls for Dealers
Dealers should be aware of potential pitfalls when dealing with lemon law claims. These include:
- Failure to properly document repairs: Incomplete or inaccurate records can weaken the dealer’s position in a legal dispute. Clear and comprehensive records are essential.
- Inadequate repair attempts: Insufficient attempts to fix the problem can harm the dealer’s case. Dealers must make reasonable efforts to address the defect.
- Lack of communication with the buyer: Poor communication can lead to misunderstandings and escalate the issue. Regular updates and clear explanations are crucial.
- Ignoring manufacturer guidelines: Failure to adhere to manufacturer guidelines can expose the dealer to legal risks. Consult the manufacturer’s instructions for resolving warranty claims.
Comparison of Dealer and Manufacturer Responsibilities
While both dealers and manufacturers have responsibilities in lemon law cases, their obligations differ. Dealers are responsible for handling the initial claim and repair attempts, while manufacturers are ultimately liable for defective parts and designs. The dealer’s focus is on addressing the defect in the vehicle, while the manufacturer focuses on the overall quality of the product.
Consumer Rights and Protections
Florida’s Lemon Law provides significant protections for consumers who purchase used vehicles that prove to be lemons. Understanding these rights is crucial for navigating the complexities of a problematic used car purchase and ensuring fair treatment. These rights extend beyond the initial purchase agreement and encompass the various remedies available to consumers.
Consumers are not powerless when dealing with a defective used car. The law Artikels clear expectations for dealers and provides avenues for consumers to pursue redress. By comprehending their rights, consumers can confidently approach these situations, ensuring their interests are protected and their experiences are resolved to their satisfaction.
Remedies Available to Consumers
Consumers facing a lemon car have recourse under Florida law. These remedies aim to restore the consumer to the position they would have been in had the vehicle performed as expected. The primary remedies often involve a return to the original purchase agreement, either through a replacement vehicle or a full refund.
- Replacement Vehicle: In certain situations, the consumer may be entitled to a replacement vehicle. This is particularly relevant when the defect in the used car is substantial and significantly affects the car’s value or use. This remedy is contingent upon the car being deemed a lemon. This means the vehicle has significant defects that have not been successfully repaired after a reasonable number of attempts.
- Refund: A full or partial refund is another possible remedy. If the consumer is unable to get a satisfactory replacement or the dealer is unwilling to offer a suitable replacement, the consumer may seek a refund. This remedy is frequently used when the dealer is unwilling to address the recurring issues or when the vehicle’s defects make it unusable.
- Repair Costs: In some cases, the consumer might be able to recover the costs associated with repairing the defects themselves. This remedy is generally pursued only when the dealer has failed to make reasonable repair attempts or the repair attempts have failed to rectify the problem.
Legal Options When Dealers Fail to Address Issues
When a dealer fails to address the issues adequately or refuses to comply with the law, the consumer has several legal options. These options should be explored in a manner that prioritizes resolution and adheres to the prescribed legal processes.
- Negotiation: The consumer should attempt to resolve the issue directly with the dealer. A clear and concise explanation of the problem, along with supporting documentation, can be beneficial in this stage. This may lead to a swift resolution without resorting to formal legal action.
- Mediation: Mediation is a process where a neutral third party assists in negotiating a settlement. This option can be beneficial when direct negotiation fails to produce results. It can help to expedite the resolution process and avoid costly legal proceedings.
- Legal Action: If attempts at negotiation and mediation prove unsuccessful, the consumer may consider legal action. This may involve filing a complaint with the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, or taking the case to court. This step should only be taken after exhausting all other options.
Consumer’s Right to a Replacement or Refund
The consumer’s right to a replacement vehicle or a refund is a cornerstone of Florida’s Lemon Law for used cars. This right is predicated on the vehicle being deemed a lemon and the dealer’s failure to rectify the defects.
The consumer has the right to a replacement vehicle or a refund if the vehicle is deemed a lemon.
Specific Scenarios Where a Consumer Might Have Grounds for a Claim
Numerous situations can lead to a consumer having grounds for a claim under Florida’s Lemon Law for used cars. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
- Recurring Problems: A vehicle with recurring problems that the dealer has failed to fix despite multiple repair attempts. This could involve issues with the engine, transmission, or other critical components.
- Unrepairable Defects: A vehicle with a significant defect that cannot be repaired or is deemed uneconomical to repair. This can be a critical factor in determining whether the vehicle is a lemon.
- Unreasonable Repair Attempts: A vehicle with defects that the dealer has attempted to fix in an unreasonable manner, or without due care and attention to the issue.
- Dealer’s Refusal to Repair: The dealer refuses to repair the vehicle or refuses to take the car back for a full refund. This is a clear violation of consumer rights.
Legal Procedures and Timeline
Navigating the Florida Lemon Law process for a used car can be complex, involving specific procedures and deadlines. Understanding these steps is crucial for consumers to effectively pursue their rights and receive a fair resolution. This section Artikels the legal procedures, key deadlines, potential outcomes, and available resources to assist consumers in their claims.
Florida’s Lemon Law provides a structured path for consumers to address defective used cars. The law Artikels the responsibilities of both consumers and dealers, ensuring a transparent and fair process. This process typically involves several steps, from initial documentation to potential legal action. It is vital to meticulously document all interactions and maintain records of communication with the dealer throughout the process.
Legal Procedures
The Florida Lemon Law process for used cars is designed to be efficient. Consumers must first exhaust all available avenues for resolving the issue with the dealer through negotiation and attempts at repair. Thorough documentation of all communication, repair attempts, and the car’s defects is critical. This documentation serves as evidence in the claim process.
Key Deadlines and Steps
The following table Artikels the crucial deadlines and steps in a Florida Lemon Law claim for a used car:
| Step | Description | Typical Deadline |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Complaint | Formal notification to the dealer and the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) outlining the car’s defects and the attempts to resolve the issue. | Within a reasonable time after the defect arises and repair attempts. Specific time frames are not fixed. |
| Dealer Response and Repairs | Dealer must address the issues and perform necessary repairs. A record of all communication and repairs must be kept. | Within a reasonable time after the initial complaint. Flexibility depends on the nature of the defect. |
| Formal Complaint to FDACS (if needed) | If the dealer fails to resolve the issue, the consumer may file a formal complaint with the FDACS. | Usually within a few months of the initial complaint, depending on attempts to resolve the issue with the dealer. |
| FDACS Investigation | FDACS investigates the claim and may recommend a resolution. | This typically takes several weeks to a few months, depending on the complexity of the case. |
| Negotiation or Mediation (if applicable) | FDACS may attempt mediation to resolve the dispute between the consumer and the dealer. | Variable, depending on the willingness of both parties to negotiate. |
| Legal Action (if necessary) | If negotiation fails, the consumer may pursue legal action. | After attempts at resolution have been exhausted, or if the FDACS fails to mediate the situation effectively. |
Typical Time Frame for Resolution
The typical time frame for resolving a lemon law claim for a used car in Florida varies significantly. A simple case with readily apparent defects might be resolved within a few months, while a complex case involving multiple repairs and disputes could take a year or more. The success and speed of a claim hinges heavily on the effectiveness of initial communications, proper documentation, and the dealer’s cooperation.
Potential Outcomes of a Lemon Law Case
Possible outcomes of a Florida Lemon Law case include:
- Settlement Agreement: The dealer agrees to a resolution, such as a refund, replacement vehicle, or repair, avoiding further legal action. This is the most common favorable outcome.
- Court Decision: If a settlement cannot be reached, the court may order a refund, replacement vehicle, or repair, potentially including reimbursement for legal fees.
- Dismissal of Claim: If the claim lacks sufficient evidence or the consumer fails to meet the requirements of the Lemon Law, the claim might be dismissed. A lack of proper documentation or failure to demonstrate a clear defect are common reasons for dismissal.
Legal Resources Available to Consumers
Florida provides several legal resources to assist consumers in lemon law claims.
- Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS): FDACS provides a website with information on the Lemon Law and complaint procedures, including contact information and guidance on filing complaints.
- Consumer Protection Attorneys: Consulting a lawyer specializing in consumer protection and lemon law cases can provide valuable legal counsel and representation throughout the process. Legal counsel can advise on the best approach to the case and represent the consumer’s interests in negotiations or court.
Resources and Assistance
Navigating the complexities of a used car lemon law claim in Florida can be challenging. Understanding available resources and seeking appropriate assistance is crucial to protecting your rights and achieving a successful resolution. This section Artikels key resources and steps to take when facing a problematic used vehicle.
Organizations Offering Assistance
Florida offers various resources to help consumers with lemon law claims. These organizations can provide valuable guidance and support throughout the process.
- Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS): The FDACS, specifically the Division of Consumer Services, is a crucial resource for consumers seeking assistance with lemon law issues. They provide information, complaint filing options, and mediation services. They are a primary point of contact for initial inquiries and often play a role in mediating disputes before litigation.
- Florida Bar: The Florida Bar maintains a directory of attorneys specializing in consumer law, including lemon law cases. Using the bar’s website or contacting their referral service can help consumers locate legal counsel familiar with Florida’s lemon law procedures.
- Consumer Protection Agencies: State and local consumer protection agencies can be valuable resources for consumers facing lemon law issues. These agencies often provide information, investigate complaints, and offer mediation services.
Finding a Legal Professional
Securing legal representation is a vital step in a used car lemon law case. Finding an attorney experienced in Florida lemon law is essential.
- Online Legal Directories: Legal directories and online search engines can help consumers locate attorneys specializing in consumer law, lemon law cases, or used car transactions. These resources often allow users to filter searches by location and area of specialization.
- Bar Association Referrals: Consulting with the Florida Bar or local bar associations can provide referrals to attorneys specializing in lemon law cases. Bar associations frequently maintain directories of attorneys with relevant expertise.
- Recommendations: Asking for recommendations from trusted sources, such as friends, family, or other consumers who have successfully resolved lemon law issues, can be helpful. Personal recommendations can offer valuable insight into an attorney’s experience and effectiveness.
Locating Consumer Protection Agencies
Knowing the proper channels for consumer protection is crucial. Several resources can direct consumers toward the right agencies.
- State and Local Government Websites: State and local government websites typically provide contact information and details about consumer protection agencies. Searching for “consumer protection” alongside the specific city or county can help locate relevant agencies.
- Online Search Engines: Online search engines can help locate relevant consumer protection agencies in specific areas. Using precise search terms such as “consumer protection agency [city name, Florida]” can provide relevant results.
Importance of Legal Counsel
Legal representation can significantly improve a consumer’s chances of success in a used car lemon law case. A skilled attorney can navigate the complexities of the legal process, protecting your rights and interests.
“Seeking legal counsel in a lemon law case can provide invaluable support in navigating the intricacies of the legal process, ensuring your rights are protected, and increasing your chances of a favorable outcome.”
Filing a Complaint with Relevant Authorities
Following the appropriate procedure for filing a complaint is essential for initiating a lemon law claim.
- Gathering Documentation: Compile all relevant documentation, including purchase agreements, repair records, and correspondence with the dealer. Comprehensive documentation strengthens the claim and aids in proving the car’s defective nature.
- Choosing the Right Agency: Consumers should contact the appropriate agency based on the nature of the complaint and applicable jurisdiction. Researching the specific agencies’ procedures and jurisdictions is crucial.
- Following Specific Procedures: Each agency has its own specific procedures for filing a complaint. Understanding these procedures ensures the complaint is filed correctly and effectively.
Illustrative Case Examples
Florida’s Lemon Law provides recourse for consumers who purchase a used car with significant defects that affect its value or safety. Understanding successful and unsuccessful claims offers valuable insights into the criteria and complexities of the law. This section presents illustrative case examples, showcasing how the law is applied in practice.
Successful Lemon Law Claim for a Used Car
A consumer purchased a used 2017 Honda Accord from a local dealership. Within the first 3 months of ownership, the car consistently experienced electrical issues, including intermittent stalling, malfunctioning headlights, and erratic speedometer readings. The consumer took the car to the dealership multiple times, but the issues persisted. The dealer claimed they were performing diagnostic tests but failed to rectify the problems. The consumer documented every repair attempt and visit, meticulously recording dates, times, and descriptions of the issues.
The consumer initiated a claim under Florida’s Lemon Law. The key elements of the case that led to success included:
- Comprehensive documentation: Detailed records of repair attempts, dates, and descriptions of problems provided substantial evidence of the car’s persistent defects.
- Multiple repair attempts: The car was taken to the dealership for repair on several occasions, but the defects continued.
- The nature of the defects: The electrical problems affected the car’s functionality and safety, demonstrating that the vehicle was not suitable for its intended use.
- Evidence of the dealer’s failure to repair: The consumer presented proof that the dealer failed to resolve the defects despite multiple attempts.
The court ruled in favor of the consumer, citing the clear evidence of the vehicle’s non-conformity and the dealer’s failure to rectify the problems. The consumer was awarded a refund or replacement vehicle.
Unsuccessful Lemon Law Claim for a Used Car
A consumer purchased a used 2015 Toyota Camry with a reported history of minor repairs. After a few months, the car developed a persistent problem with the transmission. The consumer took the car to several mechanics, but none could pinpoint the specific issue.
The consumer’s claim under Florida’s Lemon Law was unsuccessful due to:
- Insufficient documentation: While the consumer had some repair records, the documentation lacked sufficient detail regarding the specifics of the transmission problem and the attempts to diagnose and repair it.
- Lack of consistent problems: The transmission issue was intermittent, and the consumer struggled to demonstrate a pattern of recurring problems within a reasonable timeframe.
- Inability to demonstrate substantial defects: The consumer failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove that the transmission issue was a substantial defect that significantly affected the car’s use and value.
- Dealer’s defense: The dealership presented evidence that the transmission problem was a minor issue that was a common problem with that year’s model, which was not a defect that significantly impacted the vehicle’s functionality.
The court sided with the dealership, concluding that the consumer did not meet the legal requirements for a lemon under Florida law.
Case Where Consumer Did Not Qualify as a Lemon
A consumer bought a used 2018 Nissan Altima with a known issue of minor paint imperfections. After a few months, the car experienced occasional stalling issues. The consumer argued that the paint imperfections and the intermittent stalling issues made the car a lemon.
The claim was unsuccessful because:
- Minor imperfections: The paint imperfections, while undesirable, were not considered a substantial defect that significantly affected the car’s use or value.
- Intermittent stalling: The stalling issue was infrequent and not consistently reproducible, making it difficult to demonstrate a pattern of recurring problems that significantly impaired the car’s use.
- Lack of documentation: The consumer did not have adequate documentation to demonstrate that the stalling issue was a significant defect that occurred within the required timeframe and was reported to the dealer.
The court found that the issues did not meet the criteria of a lemon under Florida’s Lemon Law, as they were not sufficiently significant or consistent to warrant a claim.
